The Law Office of Matthew L. Guadagno

New York Immigration and Deportation Attorney

Call (212) 343-1373

  • Home
  • About Me
  • What I Do
    • Deportation Defense
    • Board of Immigration Appeals Cases
    • Petitions for Review
    • Detention Cases
    • Criminal Immigration
    • Citizenship
    • Adjustment of Status
    • Asylum
    • Consequences of a Plea Agreement
    • Mandamus Actions
    • Joint Motions to Reopen
    • Deferred Actions
  • My Successful Cases
  • Speaking Appearances
  • Articles
  • My Blog
  • Contact Me

I Was Quoted in an Article by Minyanville.com

August 27, 2012 by Matthew

Minyanville.com published an article about the EB-5 investor program, Investment Visas: Swapping Yacht People for Boat People.  I am quoted in the article:

“It just doesn’t seem fair that some rich person can come along and buy residency,” Matthew Guadagno, an immigration attorney in private practice, tells me. “I suppose there’s the view that you’re purportedly helping the economy, but for a guy who represents regular people, it feels wrong.”

People who are not rich usually get their green cards through the family based immigration system.  If you are married to a U.S. citizen or you have a U.S. citizen son or daughter over 21 years old, a visa is immediately available for you.  However, for all other petitioners there is a very limited amount of visas that are issued each year.  These visas are given on a first come first serve basis.  If the visas run out, then you have to wait until you’re at the top of the list.  This is why opponents to amnesty complain that creating an amnesty allows those that don’t follow the rules to “cut in line.”  There is currently a terrible backlog for people to get green cards, if you do not qualify for an immediate visa.  According to the Visa Bulletin for September 2012:

* for 1st preference visas (unmarried sons and daughters of U.S. citizens): they are currently processing applications that were filed on October 1, 2005 and earlier.  Thus, there’s an almost 7 year wait for this group.

* for 2nd preference part A visas (spouses and children of permanent residents): they are currently processing applications that were filed on May 10, 2008, and earlier.  Thus, there’s a wait of 4 years for this group.

* for 2nd preference part B visas (unmarried sons and daughters, over 21 years of age, of permanent residents): they are currently processing applications that were filed on September 15, 2004, and earlier.  Thus, there’s a wait of 8 years for this group.

* for 3rd preference visas (married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens): they are currently processing applications that were filed on May 15, 2002, and earlier.  Thus, there’s a wait of 10 years for this group.

* for 4th preference visas (brothers and sisters of adult U.S. citizens): they are currently processing applications that were filed on March 8, 2001, and earlier.  Thus, there’s a wait of 11 years for this group.

In light of the backlog of family based visas, I don’t think that it’s fair that rich people can buy their way to the top of the list.

 

 

 

 

My Opinion, Updates About Me

I Spoke on Cancellation of Removal at PLI

August 14, 2012 by Matthew

Yesterday, I spoke in New York City at the Practicing Law Institute‘s annual continuing legal education class: Defending Removal Proceedings.  I was on a panel called “The Nuts and Bolts of Cancellation of Removal.”  On the panel with me was an immigration judge, Hon. Gabriel C. Videla, and immigration lawyer, Barbara Camacho, Esq.  I like sharing my knowledge about deportation defense with new attorneys.

Updates About Me

AILA Amicus Brief filed in Second Circuit

July 27, 2012 by Matthew

Last month, I filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (“AILA”) before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.  The brief was submitted in opposition to a motion to dismiss by the Government.   The Government was seeking dismissal because the petition for review was filed in the Second Circuit after the Board of Immigration Appeals rendered a decision that granted withholding of removal, but denied asylum, and remanded the case to the Immigration Judge to conduct background checks.   On behalf of AILA, I argued that it was proper for the petitioner to file the brief at this time and that the petitioner should not have to wait for the completion of the background checks to file the petition for review.

Updates About Me

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • …
  • 18
  • Next Page »

Recent Blogs

  • Consulations Are By Appointment Only!
  • My Amazing Experience with Justice Breyer
  • My 10th Anniversary of Teaching at Brooklyn Law School!
  • My 25th Anniversary of Practicing Immigration Law!
  • My 10th Year Anniversary of Starting My Solo Practice!

From My Blog

  • All
  • Deferred Action for DREAMers
  • Immigration News
  • My Opinion
  • Success Stories
  • Things Clients Should Know
  • Updates About Me

The Law Office of
Matthew L. Guadagno

265 Canal Street, Suite 506
New York NY 10013
Tel:  (212) 343-1373
Fax: (212) 537-0019

The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer / client relationship. Prior success does not guarantee future results.

Sitemap

Matthew L. Guadagno
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...

Lawyer Website Design by AWebsiteForLawyers.com