The Law Office of Matthew L. Guadagno

New York Immigration and Deportation Attorney

Call (212) 343-1373

  • Home
  • About Me
  • What I Do
    • Deportation Defense
    • Board of Immigration Appeals Cases
    • Petitions for Review
    • Detention Cases
    • Criminal Immigration
    • Citizenship
    • Adjustment of Status
    • Asylum
    • Consequences of a Plea Agreement
    • Mandamus Actions
    • Joint Motions to Reopen
    • Deferred Actions
  • My Successful Cases
  • Speaking Appearances
  • Articles
  • My Blog
  • Contact Me

BIA Renders Important Decision About the Right to an Immigration Lawyer

August 18, 2012 by Matthew

On August 15, 2012, the Board of Immigration Appeals rendered a precedent decision called, Matter of C-B-, 25 I. & N. Dec. 888 (BIA 2012).  This is an important decision for aliens in removal proceedings.  This decision recognizes that aliens facing deportation have a statutory right under the Immigration and Nationality Act to have an immigration attorney.  This does not mean that you have the right to a free immigration lawyer.  It just means that if you want to hire an immigration attorney, you have the right to do so.  Because of the statutory right of aliens to have an immigration lawyer in removal proceedings, the Board held that, “[i]n order to meaningfully effectuate the statutory and regulatory privilege of legal representation where it has not been expressly waived, the Immigration Judge must grant a reasonable and realistic period of time to provide a fair opportunity for a respondent to seek, speak with, and retain counsel.”  This means that if you go to immigration court without an immigration lawyer and tell the immigration judge that you want to get an immigration lawyer, the immigration judge must give you time to find an immigration attorney.  Finding an immigration lawyer to represent you in your deportation proceedings is a very important decision.  The immigration judge should give you a reasonable amount of time to find the immigration attorney that you feel is right for you.

Immigration News, Things Clients Should Know

U.S. C.I.S. FAQ’s on Deferred Action for DREAMers are Misleading

August 6, 2012 by Matthew

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (“U.S. C.I.S.”) has issued a detailed page on its website with Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ).  The answer to the question: “Will the information I share in my request for consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals be used for immigration enforcement purposes?” indicates that the information will not be used for enforcement purposes unless the individual meets the “criteria” for being placed in removal proceedings.  Interestingly, the answer to this question contains the following disclaimer at the end:

This policy, which may be modified, superseded, or rescinded at any time without notice, is not intended to, does not, and may not be relied upon to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party in any administrative, civil, or criminal matter.

Another FAQ asks, “If USCIS does not exercise deferred action in my case, will I be placed in removal proceedings?”  The answer to this FAQ is “If your case does not involve a criminal offense, fraud, or a threat to national security or public safety, your case will not be referred to ICE for purposes of removal proceedings except where DHS determines there are exceptional circumstances.”  However, this FAQ does not have a disclaimer.  I consider the lack of a disclaimer for this question to be extremely misleading.  Both FAQs should have the same disclaimer or the disclaimer should appear at the beginning and clearly indicate that it applies to the entire program.

The Obama Administration has an ethical and moral obligation to make the public aware that his policy can not only be rescinded if he is not re-elected, but that the individuals who apply under this program could be placed in removal proceedings, if Mitt Romney were to be elected and decided that DREAMers should be deported.  Mr. Romney’s website is critical of President Obama for “selective” enforcement of the immigration laws and indicates that: (1) he will discourage illegal immigration; (2) enforce the law; and (3) oppose amnesty for illegal immigration.  Unless Mr. Romney indicates that he will not deport DREAMers, no one should apply for deferred action under the President’s policy until after the election.  What’s the harm in waiting until November?

DREAMers should not be pawns in President Obama’s political game of chess in getting re-elected.  He is putting people who are vulnerable and desperate at risk.

 

Deferred Action for DREAMers, Immigration News, My Opinion, Things Clients Should Know

DREAMers Need to Wait Until After the Election

August 1, 2012 by Matthew

All over the internet, there seems to be a buzz about President Obama’s policy to grant deferred action for non-citizens who would benefit from the DREAM Act.  Everyone seems to be excited about the idea that individuals who are undocumented will have the opportunity to work legally and not fear deportation.  Everyone seems to be praising President Obama for his policy.  I do not share their enthusiasm.

President Obama has merely issued a policy.  This is NOT a law.  Once the Obama Presidency is over, the next president is free to discontinue the policy.  What President Obama has done is not a wonderful thing.  It is an election year stunt that is taking advantage of people who are desperate.  During the Republican Primaries, Mitt Romney repeatedly stated that he opposed the DREAM Act, so it should be no surprise that Mr. Romney has come out and stated that he will not continue the policy, if he is elected.

A lot of people may be thinking that if they get their paper work in right away, it will be approved and they’ll have deferred action for 2 years.  When President Obama announced his policy in June, he indicated that it would take the Citizenship and Immigration Service (CIS) until August 15th to come up with a procedure for applying.  There is a rumor that there will be a filing fee.  I suspect that due to the volume of requests that will be received, as well as the bureaucracy that will be created to process the requests, it will take months for the requests to be processed.   It’s very likely to take months for these applications to be processed.  If CIS actually begins accepting applications on August 15th, it’s not likely that it will be approved before the election.  If Obama loses and your application is not processed before Romney takes office, they you will have wasted your money on the application.  If you file before the election and Romney wins, not only is it likely that you will not receive deferred action, but you run the risk of bringing yourself to the attention of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for deportation.  The election is a little over three months away.  What’s the harm in waiting to file your deferred action request?

 

 

 

Deferred Action for DREAMers, Immigration News, My Opinion, Things Clients Should Know

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Next Page »

Recent Blogs

  • Consulations Are By Appointment Only!
  • My Amazing Experience with Justice Breyer
  • My 10th Anniversary of Teaching at Brooklyn Law School!
  • My 25th Anniversary of Practicing Immigration Law!
  • My 10th Year Anniversary of Starting My Solo Practice!

From My Blog

  • All
  • Deferred Action for DREAMers
  • Immigration News
  • My Opinion
  • Success Stories
  • Things Clients Should Know
  • Updates About Me

The Law Office of
Matthew L. Guadagno

265 Canal Street, Suite 506
New York NY 10013
Tel:  (212) 343-1373
Fax: (212) 537-0019

The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer / client relationship. Prior success does not guarantee future results.

Sitemap

Matthew L. Guadagno
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...

Lawyer Website Design by AWebsiteForLawyers.com