The Law Office of Matthew L. Guadagno

New York Immigration and Deportation Attorney

Call (212) 343-1373

  • Home
  • About Me
  • What I Do
    • Deportation Defense
    • Board of Immigration Appeals Cases
    • Petitions for Review
    • Detention Cases
    • Criminal Immigration
    • Citizenship
    • Adjustment of Status
    • Asylum
    • Consequences of a Plea Agreement
    • Mandamus Actions
    • Joint Motions to Reopen
    • Deferred Actions
  • My Successful Cases
  • Speaking Appearances
  • Articles
  • My Blog
  • Contact Me

Some Thoughts on Arizona v. United States

June 26, 2012 by Matthew

On June 25, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Arizona v. United States.  The decision struck down 3 out of 4 provisions of Arizona’s SB 1070.  The 3 provisions that were struck down involved:

1. A requirement that non-citizens carry identification and subjected them to criminal penalties for failure to comply.

2. A penalty for non-citizens that work without authorization to work in the United States.

3. Authorization of state and local police to make warrantless arrests of individuals who were believed to be removable.

These provisions were struck down because they deemed to be “preempted” by federal law.  Certain areas of law, like immigration, are deemed to be the sole responsibility of the federal government, so that the states may not legislate them.

The fourth provision involved authorization of the police to request papers of individuals that they believe to be undocumented.  This has been referred to as the “show me your papers” provision.”  Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has been claiming victory because this provision was not struck down.  I don’t view the Supreme Court’s decision as a victory for Governor Brewer.  The Supreme Court’s decision did not expressly uphold this provision.  The decision merely concluded that it was too early to determine whether this provision is proper because to do so would require a factual determination as to how the provision is applied.  To me, this is not a victory for the State of Arizona.  The Supreme Court merely left the battle for another day.

If there was any debate as to who won this battle, it was settled after the Supreme Court’s decision when the Department of Homeland Security announced that it was cancelling Arizona’s participation in the 287(g) program.  287(g) refers to a provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act that provides that the federal government can literally deputize state and local law enforcement officials to enforce immigration laws.  One of the benefits of 287(g) is that state participants have access to federal immigration databases.  By kicking Arizona out of 287(g), it no longer has direct access to the federal government’s immigration databases.  As a result, when Arizona law enforcement officials arrest a suspected undocumented alien, they do not have the ability to check the federal immigration database on their own.  Instead, they must call the Immigration and Custom Enforcement and will be at their whim.

 

 

Immigration News, My Opinion

Recent Blogs

  • Consulations Are By Appointment Only!
  • My Amazing Experience with Justice Breyer
  • My 10th Anniversary of Teaching at Brooklyn Law School!
  • My 25th Anniversary of Practicing Immigration Law!
  • My 10th Year Anniversary of Starting My Solo Practice!

From My Blog

  • All
  • Deferred Action for DREAMers
  • Immigration News
  • My Opinion
  • Success Stories
  • Things Clients Should Know
  • Updates About Me

Earlier Posts

  • January 2024
  • June 2022
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • November 2011

The Law Office of
Matthew L. Guadagno

265 Canal Street, Suite 506
New York NY 10013
Tel:  (212) 343-1373
Fax: (212) 537-0019

The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer / client relationship. Prior success does not guarantee future results.

Sitemap

Matthew L. Guadagno
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...

Lawyer Website Design by AWebsiteForLawyers.com